WhatsApp Channel Join Now
Telegram Channel Join Now
YouTube Channel Join Now

Guyana’s Seabob Plan: Co-ops to Global Export by 2032

On 8 October 2026, in Georgetown, Guyana, a room full of people who rarely sit at the same table — government officials, trawler owners, artisanal fishers, processors, exporters and researchers — gathered for a closing event. The occasion was the end of a programme with an unwieldy name, FISH4ACP, and a very concrete subject: a small pink shrimp called Atlantic seabob, and the fishing families whose livelihoods depend on it.

The headline from that Legacy Event is not a new subsidy or a new harbour. It is something quieter, and arguably harder: Guyana now has a shared plan to turn its seabob fishery — already one of the world’s largest — into a sustainable, well-regulated export industry by 2032, with fishing cooperatives, not just companies, at the centre of it. For readers in India, where small-scale fishers are fighting for exactly the same things — recognition, bargaining power, safety at sea and a fair share of export value — the Guyana story is worth studying closely.

Guyana’s seabob at a glance

Fact What is verified
Species Atlantic seabob, a small commercially valued shrimp harvested by trawlers and artisanal fishers
Production About 9,165 tonnes a year (FAO, March 2026)
World position Guyana is the world’s largest producer of Atlantic seabob (United Nations in Guyana)
Two value chains A few industrial processors export frozen peeled shrimp abroad; artisanal fishers mainly supply domestic markets
Programme FISH4ACP — an Organisation of African, Caribbean and Pacific States (OACPS) initiative, implemented by FAO, funded by the European Union and Germany’s Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ)
Closing event Legacy Event, Georgetown, 8 October 2026
The 2032 vision Strengthen Guyana’s position as a leading global seabob exporter through a sustainable, resilient industrial and artisanal value chain, supported by effective regulation and reliable data

Why seabob needed a plan at all

Seabob looks like an easy success story — a high-demand product, strong markets in the United States and Europe, and a country that already leads the world in producing it. The FAO’s own value-chain analysis, however, flagged a problem that should sound familiar to any fisheries reader: catches of seabob were declining, and the artisanal side of the fishery — the small fishers, and especially the women in it — was not capturing its share of the value.

The opportunity, as FAO framed it, was real but conditional: strong demand for more high-value seabob abroad if biological stock problems could be addressed and bigger shrimps caught, plus strong domestic demand for fresh seabob from restaurants and supermarkets. In other words, the market was waiting — but only for a fishery that could prove it was managed, safe and traceable.

What FISH4ACP actually changed

Dr Gillian Smith, FAO Representative for Guyana, summed up the programme’s work at the Legacy Event in one sentence: it had “significantly advanced the plan to upgrade the Atlantic Seabob value chain and make it more sustainable, well-managed and resilient,” improving data collection, stock management, food safety and quality, and safety at sea, “with a focus on reinforcing fisheries cooperatives.”

Four changes stand out:

1. Data before decisions: CALIPSEO

FISH4ACP introduced CALIPSEO, a digital fisheries information system developed by FAO. Its data helps Guyana’s Fisheries Department make decisions that support fishers, strengthen the sector and protect fish stocks for the future. The EU’s Ambassador to Guyana, Luca Pierantoni, singled out this digital infrastructure at the Legacy Event, saying Guyana could eventually share its expanded capabilities with other countries in the region. For a fishery wrestling with declining catches, reliable data is not paperwork — it is the difference between guessing and managing.

2. Safety at sea, written down

The programme delivered training in the safe and healthy handling of seabob products and produced a practical manual, the Safety Guide for Artisanal Seabob Fishers in Guyana. That sits alongside a wider Occupational Safety and Health Strategy for the seabob value chain, developed with the Fisheries Department, the Guyana Association of Trawler Owners and Seafood Processors (GATOSP) and the Guyana National Fisherfolk Organisation (GNFO). The reason safety matters commercially, not just morally: maintaining Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) certification is essential for export market access, and European Union regulations increasingly require exporting firms to demonstrate internationally recognised labour standards.

3. One table for the whole chain: the Seabob Working Group

Dr Richard Blair, Advisor to CARICOM and the Ministry of Agriculture, named the Seabob Working Group as a key FISH4ACP achievement — a forum bringing government, fishers, processors, exporters and researchers together to address the industry’s challenges. He also reported continued government support for the sector: almost $4 billion invested during 2025 and 2026, including refurbishment of landing sites and direct assistance to almost 6,000 fishers. (The figure is as reported by Kaieteur News and News Room Guyana; the reports do not break down the currency split, so this post does not convert it.)

4. Cooperatives treated as businesses

This is the heart of the social story. Working with the International Labour Organization (ILO) and the Ministry of Labour’s Cooperatives Department, FISH4ACP supported artisanal fishing cooperatives and informal fisher groups with training in governance, membership engagement, financial management and organisational planning. The ILO’s dedicated cooperative project ran from December 2024 to January 2026.

Joni Musabayana, Director of the ILO Decent Work Team and Office for the Caribbean, put the logic plainly: one fisher or processor alone may struggle to secure finance, reach better markets, buy inputs at a reasonable cost, influence decisions or access services — but as organised groups, they can pool resources and knowledge, strengthen governance, negotiate from a stronger position and make their voices heard. Aslin Singh, Advisor to Guyana’s Minister of Labour and Manpower Planning, added the discipline that makes it work: “Cooperatives are not social organisations; they are businesses that create opportunities for their members” — and the Cooperatives Department will keep helping with registration, management and proper record-keeping.

The cooperatives that proved it: five and counting

FAO’s March 2026 account of the cooperative work gives the story its faces. Deonarine Singh, Chairman of Guyana’s Region Two Fishermen Coop, said his group’s aim was “to make fishing more sustainable and affordable, while also creating stronger networks and communication among fisherfolk.” In October 2025, his group and the Sheet Anchor Friends Fishermen Cooperative Society gained formal recognition as cooperatives — a milestone that raised the total number of coastal fisheries cooperatives in Guyana to five.

Recognition was not symbolic. Singh explained: “As a registered cooperative, we were able to access more public support to establish a stand to sell fresh fish directly to the community — something that was not possible when we applied as individuals.” Rishiram Ramkissoon, Chairman of the Sheet Anchor Friends society, said the training helped his group secure formal recognition, and laid out what comes next: “We plan to create a space for mending seines, establish an office for meetings, and open a small shop to provide easy access to essential equipment.”

Across six training sessions held in September and October, fishing groups learned how to register as cooperatives, maintain their status, and understand their legal and financial responsibilities under Guyanese law, alongside business planning and governance skills. FISH4ACP is also working with the Caribbean Natural Resources Institute (CANARI) to strengthen the representational capacity of the GNFO and the Seabob Working Group, so cooperatives have a unified voice at national level.

The 2032 vision — and what it honestly does not promise

Future work will be guided by a vision statement covering a ten-year period ending in 2032. Its aim is to strengthen Guyana’s position as a leading global seabob exporter by building a sustainable and resilient industrial and artisanal value chain that is well-regulated and supported by data, with improved infrastructure for artisanal fishers, expanded fish cooperatives, and continued empowerment of women and young people.

Note what this is — and what it is not. It is a vision and a direction agreed at a closing event, not a funding announcement with a per-fisher amount, and this post claims no such figure. There is no application window attached to this story: FISH4ACP’s Guyana programme has wrapped up, and the next phase is institutional follow-through by the government, the Seabob Working Group, the ILO and FAO. Readers should not treat this as a scheme they can apply to today.

The risks are also stated openly in the sources. Declining catches have to be reversed, not just monitored. Export access depends on keeping MSC certification and meeting labour standards — a bar that requires constant work, not a one-time audit. And a vision only survives if the Seabob Working Group keeps meeting after the programme staff leave. As Dr Blair put it, “this collaborative approach will be crucial going forward.”

Five lessons India can take from Guyana’s seabob story

  1. Organise first, then negotiate. Guyana’s cooperatives gained market access, public support and a direct sales stand only after formal recognition — the same sequence India’s small-scale fisher organisations are demanding in the NPOA-SSF consultations.
  2. Treat cooperatives as businesses. Governance, financial management and record-keeping training — not just registration — is what turned Guyana’s groups from associations into negotiating partners.
  3. Make safety an export asset. The Safety Guide and the OSH Strategy are not welfare extras; they protect the MSC certification that keeps export doors open.
  4. Put every actor at one table. Government, fishers, processors, exporters and researchers in the Seabob Working Group is the model India’s state-level consultations are already experimenting with.
  5. Data is a social policy. CALIPSEO’s catch and stock data protects the resource that artisanal livelihoods depend on — and gives small fishers evidence when decisions are made about their fishery.

Related reading on Fisheries India

If this story interests you, these earlier Fisheries India reports cover the same themes — cooperatives, women in fisheries and small-scale fishers organising for a better deal:

Frequently asked questions

What is Atlantic seabob?
A small, commercially valued shrimp harvested by trawlers and artisanal fishers off Guyana. Guyana is the world’s largest producer, at about 9,165 tonnes a year.

What was FISH4ACP?
An OACPS initiative implemented by FAO with EU and German BMZ funding, working across Africa, the Caribbean and the Pacific to make fisheries and aquaculture value chains more productive and sustainable. In Guyana it focused on the seabob value chain.

Is there a fund or scheme to apply to?
No. The Guyana programme has closed with a Legacy Event on 8 October 2026, and the 2032 vision is a direction for government and industry follow-through — not an open application window. No grant amount per fisher is announced in the sources, so none is claimed here.

Why do cooperatives matter so much in this story?
Because they convert individual fishers — who struggle alone for finance, markets and services — into groups that can negotiate prices, access public support and influence sector decisions. Guyana’s coastal fisheries cooperatives now number five, after two more gained formal recognition in October 2025.

What could still go wrong?
Declining seabob catches, loss of MSC certification, or the Seabob Working Group fading once programme support ends. The vision names regulation, data and infrastructure as the safeguards — but all three need sustained funding and political attention.

Official links and sources

Fact-check note, 30 October 2026: every date, figure and quote above was checked against the five sources listed, all read on 30 October 2026. No deadline, grant or application window is claimed, because none is announced in those sources. The almost-$4-billion investment figure is reported as stated, without currency conversion, because the source reports do not specify a breakdown. The featured image and the portrait/pin versions are illustrations created for this article, not photographs of the Georgetown event or of named individuals.

Leave a Comment